Being Britain and fairly safe on my islands I planned to wait for an opening before choosing who to attack first. The alternatives were Spain, Germany and Russia. Germany was by far the most lucrative of them all having all those nice coastal centers in the lowlands and Scandinavia. Spain was already hostile and had defences against me, so attacking him would have been complicated. Russia was a bit far away in the east and had only two centers I really could have taken from him: Sweden and Murmansk.
I attacked Germany in fall of 1997 and took first Holland and the next year Sweden from him. In 1999 Germany went CD and capturing rest of him became relatively easy. The only problem was to get enough armies quickly enough to capture his inland centers before anyone else could do the same.
I decided to secure the northern waters for my personal use. To achieve that I needed to capture Gdansk and see that Russia didn't survive with Murmansk or StP. After that it was fairly simple to build a stalemate line on Baltic and Finland. That would make it about 95% certain that I would at least survive the game, if not win it all alone.
The next goal was to keep Italy from growing anymore. I sent loads of armies to southern Germany and northern France and kept pushing against Italian troops in Switzerland and France. I captured Lyon and Switzerland before it was time to stab France and take Paris and Bordeaux from him.
It became impossible to get any further than that. Spain made some mistakes in the Med that allowed Italy to gain control of the sea areas between Iberia and Apenninia. His fleets on Gulf of Lyon and Ligurian Sea were able to secure him Marseilles. Poland on the other hand was growing rapidly at the expense of Ukranian mistakes. Should him and Italy choose to work together, I might have had a bit of difficulties in Central Europe. I had to reinforce my line of defence there and I needed more armies for that. It was time to stab Spain.
I think Poland did an excellent job surviving the first few years under Russian attack and finally killing him pretty much all by himself. Also, Ukraine died amazingly quickly. I think he went from 7 centers down to 4 in one year and lost the rest within two years. Maybe some poor play on his behalf but also some good moves by the polish.
Egypt also did a fairly good job at finally killing Turkey and putting up a stalemate line against Poland. I was hoping for him to take the easy centers and attack Italy so that I could have an easier access to Med, but of course he would not do such a mistake. Too bad... :)
Congrats to both of you for a game well played and thanks to Vince for setting up the game and keeping it running smoothly.
Mikko (tml@snakemail.hut.fi)
Britain in Blitzz
I joined in shortly after Poland began her attack on me, and shortly there after was NMR'd when the judge processed a phase early. In that phase Poland managed to completly out flank me, and her superior play spelled my doom soon afterward.
Watching the rest of the moves play out was very interesting, the way you guys played was impressive. Congratualtions.
On the settings, I liked them alot. They created a quick and fun game.
Simon
simsikin@idirect.com
Russia
All of my troops were occupied by Russia, when Germany went CD and Britain started swarming on the mainland. If I tried to get some of the easy picking SC's I'd leave a vacuum behind for Russia to take advantage of. Italy was huge compared to everyone else and started comming up the mainland to meet the british. I needed a naval power to assist me in the south and occupy the British, and was happy to see the Italiens working with me.
I got miffed at that because I felt it enabled the British to seal my port and lock me out. I was thankful that the British didn't push the attack; I couldn't survive an attack from a coordinated Ukraine and Britain. Instead Britian setup a stalemate line that I couldn't break through, so I concentrated solely on eliminating Ukraine for causing me such a loss.
I was surprised at how fast he crumbled. I was still allied with the Italiens and trying to get my armies up against the British to break through the stalemate line he had put up.
I had two concerns at this point. The need to break the British line in coordination with Italy. And the need to seal my southern borders from Turkey.
I knew I couldn't hold any of the coastal SC in the Med with out fleets but I could control the Black sea.
Unfortunatly Italy wasn't cooperating as I thought he would. He must have seen me more as a competitor instead of an Ally against Britain and started hitting my SC's. I didn't know how to read Italy at all. So I continued my movement to the South taking over the Turkish lands.
I stopped in Iran hoping to share Turkey with Egypt. I still needed to get Istanbul and bulgaria which were proving difficult.
For too long I kept supporting Egypt into Adana and trying to push my army from Ankara to Istanbul. He never got the message, I think I should have just continued to press on south, and allow Italy to grow again. The alliance between Spain and Britain was frustrating, mainly because Britain kept growing and Spain stayed the same, yet Spain never altered course.
Italy never coordinated with me to break through the British line and Britian was sending more troops to Central Europe to make the line impenatrable. The only way I could get Gdansk back was to come up through Switzland and move north.
The Italians came back and slowed the British just enough to allow the Egyptians to get there and enable the draw.
The NMR aspect kept the game going, which I enjoyed immensly, but the deadlines were probably too fast for a NMR game. Going CD should be another whole day or maybe two. The penalty is just too steep.
I also learned to never leave your border unguarded to an ally. He may go CD and then someone else take him over and not be so friendly. I think that was what happened with Ukraine early on.
I learned a lot from watching how the British played. It was easy to figure out his intentions, I wish he had been an ally instead of an adversary.
Britian seemed to understand the stalemate line and didn't waste his time or units trying to push further.
I didn't get the impression the Italy understood this concept of a stalemate line. I'd reach point of expansion where it didn't make sense to go further, because I would only be pushed back. And I wanted to push against the Britains not Italy. He never seemed to think about what my desires and concerns might be.
Ukraine did that with Bielorussia a couple of times. I owned it in the Fall and he would take it in the spring. I easily pushed him back out every fall, all the while moving my units around to take advantage of this yo-yo effect Bielorussia has.
With Italy CD and Egypt contesting the line I wanted, I felt that I should have just continued my rush straight down into Egyptian territory. Before Italy went CD though I felt that having Egypt as an ally would be better, but he never got that message.
It was very frustrating.
I hesitated so many times, thinking will he get the message yet? that I blew my opportunity.
Thanks to Vince for keeping the game going and setting it up. Congratulations to Britain and Egypt for a game well played.
Joe Carl (jcarl@cannet.com)
Poland in Blitzz
Spain's main purpose was to remove Britian from the Iberian Pen and form a strong hold against Britain and Italy. Well that was until France made a move towards me. So I was grateful that Britian decided it was OK t hat I had booted him out of my area and was going to let me focus on Italy and France.
France was my first concern, but I handled holding her off very easily by blocking up Nav and Bar. Then came time to take out Italy.
This is where Britain so nicely refered to Spains mistakes. What happened was I left town thinking, I could connect up with my laptop but the hotel I was in didn't allow long distance phone calls.(That's what I get for staying in Arizona.) Anyway, I went CD and someone else kindly took over my spot , and in doing so decided it was more important to remove the LONE Egyptian Army in Mor then to push forward into Italy.
So this brings us to when I took over Egypt. She was down to 5 units with Poland advancing . Italy was not attacking becuase he was working on Spain. So this gave me the chance to rebuild my defense against Poland. I decided that a good spot to put up a Stalemate line was the ANK, ADA IRQ line. So I worked slowly trying to remove Poland and it did help that he was trying to get a similiar line but there was now way I was going to give up IST.
I would like to wish congrats to England and Poland for there Outstanding Game play. Both of you are very honorable players and I would enjoy playing with you again.
Master, how about another game, but this time give 24hrs before going CD?
-Leader of the Nile!
Master: Vincent Mous vim2@rocketmail.com Britain: Mikko Laitinen mikko.laitinen@vtt.fi,tml@snakemail.hut.fi Egypt: Robert Shepard rshepard@ncgate.newcollege.edu from F2005M: Matt Lovell mannix@gaia.vr.net from F2008B: Erik Stensland estensla@csgp.com France: Michael Artz martz@ozemail.com.au Germany: Doug Gray penngray@netrover.com from S2000R: Bill Walker wwalker@utdallas.edu Italy: Steven Randall blkhorse@u.washington.edu from F2013B: Mark Kennedy mkennedy@portal.ca Poland: Joseph W. Carl Jr jcarl@cannet.cannet.com Russia: Craig Thomson jascraig@geko.net.au from F1997B: Simon Hastings James Withers simsikin@idirect.com Spain: Erik Stensland estensla@csgp.com from F2007M: Nuno Garoupa 101364.3674@compuserve.com from F2011M: Stewart Alexander scalexan@students.wisc.edu Turkey: Shlomi Yaakobovich csmj23@pluto.technion.ac.il from S2003R: Peter Morzinski PeterMorzi@aol.com from S2010R: Daniel Hannigan Daniel.Hannigan@eurocontrol.fr Ukraine: Oren Phipps xhi@sbt.net Game parameters are/were as follows: Move clock -1 min 0.00 next 12.00 grace 12.00 delay 0.10 days sMTWTFs Retreat clock -1 min 0.00 next 12.00 grace 12.00 delay 0.10 days sMTWTFs Adjust clock -1 min 0.00 next 12.00 grace 12.00 delay 0.10 days sMTWTFs Access: Different-site, Level: Any, Moderated, Dedication: -100. Variant: Modern, Gunboat. Flags: NMR, NoProxy, DIAS. Press: None (except to Master). Winning Centers: 33. Index: 143 Judge: USEF. Game Started: Tue Jan 2 03:54:41 1996 Draw declared: Mon Mar 18 02:29:30 1996 The game was declared a draw between Poland, Egypt and Britain. This is meant to be a very-fast game with moves processing at most every 24 hours no matter what. I will not give any extensions, and there will be no waiting for positions that are abandoned to be filled. Expect to go NMR once or twice as you miss a deadline and grace, but just get back in the game as your opponents will surely miss one or two as well. For those who don't know the modern variant, send the following to the judge: get info.modern get map.modern get modern.ps Have fun! Vince/GM Historical Supply Center Summary -------------------------------- Mor Nap Mil Cro Gre Ist Ank Isr Ale Lib Irn Kha Kie Rum Aus Kra Gda Bie Year Tun Rom Ven Ser Bul Izm Ada Cai Asw Sau Geo Sev Ode Hun Cze War Lit Mos 1994 . . I I I I . . . . T T T T . E E E . . . . U U U U . . . . P P P . . R 1995 B I I I I I I I T T T T T T E T E E E E T R U U U U U I . . R P P P P R 1996 S I I I I I I I T T T T T T E E E E I E T R U U U U U I I . P P P P P R 1997 S I I I I I I I I T T T T E E E E E I T T R U U U U U I I . P P P P P R 1998 S I I I I I I I T I T T U T E I E E I E T U U U U U U I G P P P P P P P 1999 S S I I I I I I T T T T T T E E E I E E T U U U U U U I I P P P P P P P 2000 S I T F I I I I T T T T T T E E E E I E T U U U U U U I G P P P P P U P 2001 S I I F I F I T T T T T T T E E E E E E T U U U U U U I I P P P P P P P 2002 S S I I I I I I T T T T T T E E E E E E E U U U U U U P I P P P P B P P 2003 S S I I I I I I T T T T T E E E E E E E T U U P U U U U I P P P B B P P 2004 S S I I I I I I T T T T T T E E E E E E T U P U P P U I I P P P B B P P 2005 S S I I I I I I T T T T T T E E E E E E T U P P P P U I I P P P B B P P 2006 E S I I I I I I T I T T T E E E E E S T T U P P P P I P I P P P B B P P 2007 E S I I I I I I T T T T T T E E E E S E E P P P P P P I I P P P B B P P 2008 S I I I I I I I T T T E P T E E E E S E P P P P P P P I I P P P B B P P 2009 S I I I I I I I I T E E P P E E E E E E P P P P P P P I I P P P B B P P 2010 S I I I I I I I I I E E P P E E E E E E P P P P P P P I P P P P B B P P 2011 S I I I I I P I I I E E P E E E E E E E P P P P P P P I P P P P B B P P 2012 I I I I I I I P I I E E P E E E E E E E P P P P P P P I P P P P B B P P 2013 I I I I I I P P E P E E E P E E E E E E P P P P P P P P P P P P B B P P 2014 I I I I I P P P E P E E E E E E E E E E P P P P P P P P P P P P B B P P 2015 I E E I P P P P E P E E E E E E E E E E P P P P P P P P P P P P B B P P 2016 I E E E P P P P E P E E E E E E E E E E P P P P P P P P P P P P B B P P 2017 E E E E P P P P E P E E E E E E E E E E P P P P P P P P P P P P B B P P Historical Supply Center Summary (cont) --------------------------------------- Gor Stp Nor Swe Ber Mun Bel Mon Lyo Bor Liv Lon Sve Mad Year Ros Mur Den Ham Fra Hol Swi Mar Par Ire Edi Gib Bar Por 1994 R R R R . . . G G G G . . . . F F F F . B B B B S S S . 1995 R R R R B G G G G G G G B F F F F F F B B B B S S S S S 1996 R U R R B G R G G G G G B F F F F F F B B B B S S S S S 1997 R U P R B G G G G G G B B G F I F F F B B B B S S S S S 1998 R U R R B G B G G G G B B I I I F F F B B B B S S S S S 1999 R U P R B B B B P G G B B I I I F F F B B B B S S S S S 2000 P U P R B B B B B G I B B I I I I F F B B B B S S S S S 2001 P U P P B B B B B G I B B G I I I F F B B B B S S S S S 2002 P U P P B B B B B G I B B G I I I F B B B B B S S S S S 2003 P U P B B B B B B B B B B I I I I F B B B B B S S S S S 2004 P U P B B B B B B B B B B I I I I B B B B B B S S S S S 2005 P U P B B B B B P B I B B I I I B B B B B B B S S S S S 2006 P P P B B B B B B B I B B B I I B B B B B B B S S S S S 2007 P P P B B B B B B B B B B I I I B B B B B B B S S S S S 2008 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S S S S S 2009 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S S S S S 2010 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S S S S S 2011 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S S S S B 2012 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S S S S B 2013 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S S B S B 2014 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B I I B B B B B B B S B B S B 2015 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B I B B 2016 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 2017 P P P B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B History of Supply Center Counts ------------------------------- Power 1994 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 Player Britain 4 7 6 7 8 10 11 11 13 17* Mikko Laitinen Egypt 3 5 5 5 4 5* 5 6 7 7 Robert Shepard France 4 6 6 4 3 3 3 4* 1 1 Michael Artz Germany 4 7 6 7 6 2 \ Doug Gray 2 2 2 Bill Walker Italy 4 8 10 12 14 12 12 10 11 11 Steven Randall Poland 3 4 5 6 7 9 8 10* 10& 8 Joseph W. Carl Jr Russia 5 7 6 4 \ Craig Thomson 3 2 1 Simon Hastings James Withers Spain 3 5 6 6 6 7 6 6 7 7 Erik Stensland Turkey 4 8 7 6 5 7 8 8 6 \ Shlomi Yaakobovich 6 Peter Morzinski Ukraine 4 5 6 6 8 7 8 7 7 7 Oren Phipps Index: 14 40 41 44 50 51 53 52 57 65 Power 2004 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 Player Britain 18 17 19 19 20 20 20 21 21 22 Mikko Laitinen Egypt 6 \ Robert Shepard 6 6 7 6 \ Matt Lovell 8 8 9 9 10 Erik Stensland Italy 12 12 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 8 Steven Randall Poland 10 12 13 14* 16* 17 18 18 18 21* Joseph W. Carl Jr Spain 7 7 7 \ Erik Stensland 7 7 6 6 \ Nuno Garoupa 5 4 3 Stewart Alexander Turkey 7 7 6 6 4 1 \ Peter Morzinski Daniel Hannigan Ukraine 4 3 1 Oren Phipps Index: 71 72 79 81 87 93 96 99 100 109 Power 2014 '15 '16 '17 Player Britain 23 26 27 27 Mikko Laitinen Egypt 11 13 14 15* Erik Stensland Italy 7* 3 1 Mark Kennedy Poland 21 22 22 22 Joseph W. Carl Jr Spain 2 \ Stewart Alexander Index: 114 133 141 143 * = 1 unused build. & = 2 unused builds. Index is the sum of squares of the number of supply centers divided by the number of players. It is a measure of how far the game has progressed.